National Epics
By Kate Milner Rabb
Preface
By
Kate Milner Rabb
1896
To My Mother.
This volume is intended for an introduction to the study of the epics. While the simplicity and directness of the epic style seem to make such a book unnecessary, the fact that to many persons of literary tastes some of these great poems are inaccessible, and that to many more the pleasure of exploring for themselves “the realms of gold” is rendered impossible by the cares of business, has seemed sufficient excuse for its being. Though the beauty of the original is of necessity lost in a condensation of this kind, an endeavor has been made to preserve the characteristic epithets, and to retain what Mr. Arnold called “the simple truth about the matter of the poem.” It is believed that the sketch prefacing each story, giving briefly the length, versification, and history of the poem, will have its value to those readers who have not access to the epics, and that the selections following the story, each recounting a complete incident, will give a better idea of the epic than could be formed from passages scattered through the text.
The epic originated among tribes of barbarians, who deified departed heroes and recited legends in praise of their deeds. As the hymn developed, the chorus and strophe were dropped, and the narrative only was preserved. The word “epic” was used simply to distinguish the narrative poem, which was recited, from the lyric, which was sung, and from the dramatic, which was acted.
As the nation passed from childhood to youth, the legends of the hero that each wandering minstrel had changed to suit his fancy, were collected and fused into one by some great poet, who by his power of unification made this written epic his own.
This is the origin of the Hindu epics, the “Iliad” and the “Odyssey,” the “Kalevala,” the “Shah-Nameh,” “Beowulf,” the “Nibelungen Lied,” the “Cid," and the “Song of Roland.”
The conditions for the production of the primitive epic exist but once in a nation’s growth. Its later epics must be written on subjects of national importance, chosen by the poet, who arranges and embellishes his material according to the rules of the primitive epic. To this class belong the “Aeneid,” the “Jerusalem Delivered,” and the “Lusiad.” Dante’s poem is broader, for it is the epic of mediaeval Christianity. Milton likewise sought “higher argument” than
“Wars, hitherto the only argument
Heroic deemed,”
and crystallized the religious beliefs of his time in “Paradise Lost.”
The characteristics both of the primitive and the modern epic are their uniform metre, simplicity of construction, concentration of action into a short time, and the use of episode and dialogue. The main difference lies in the impersonality of the primitive epic, whose author has so skillfully hidden himself behind his work that, as some one has said of Homer, “his heroes are immortal, but his own existence is doubtful.”
Although the historical events chronicled in the epics have in every case been so distorted by the fancy of the poets that they cannot be accepted as history, the epics are storehouses of information concerning ancient manners and customs, religious beliefs, forms of government, treatment of women, and habits of feeling.
Constructed upon the noblest principles of art, and pervaded by the eternal calm of the immortals, these poems have an especial value to us, who have scarcely yet realized that poetry is an art, and are feverish from the unrest of our time. If by the help of this volume any reader be enabled to find a portion of the wisdom that is hidden in these mines, its purpose will have been accomplished.
My thanks are due to Mr. John A. Wilstach for the use of selections from his translation of the “Divine Comedy;” to Prof. J. M. Crawford, for the use of selections from his translation of the “Kalevala;” to Henry Holt & Co., for the use of selections from Rabillon’s translation of “La Chanson de Roland;” to Roberts Brothers, for the use of selections from Edwin Arnold’s “Indian Idylls;” to Prof. J. C. Hall, for the use of selections from his translation of “Beowulf;” and to A. C. Armstrong & Son, for the use of selections from Conington’s Translation of the “Aeneid.” The selections from the “Iliad” and the “Odyssey” are used with the permission of and by special arrangement with Houghton, Mifflin & Co., publishers of Bryant’s translations of the “Iliad” and the “Odyssey.” Special thanks are due to Miss Eliza G. Browning of the Public Library of Indianapolis, to Miss Florence Hughes of the Library of Indiana University, and to Miss Charity Dye, of Indianapolis.
K. M. R.
Indianapolis, IND., September, 1896.
Continue...