Comments on: Reda report: the good, the not-so-bad and the ugly compromise amendments https://communia-association.org/2015/06/15/reda-report-the-good-the-not-so-bad-and-the-ugly-compromise-amendments/ Website of the COMMUNIA Association for the Public Domain Wed, 26 Jan 2022 11:06:07 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.4.2 By: Federico https://communia-association.org/2015/06/15/reda-report-the-good-the-not-so-bad-and-the-ugly-compromise-amendments/#comment-61721 Tue, 16 Jun 2015 13:51:25 +0000 http://communia-association.org/?p=1379#comment-61721 Heh, and it was amendment 166 which encountered a problem with the electronical voting system. Second 2070 of the registration: http://www.europarl.europa.eu/news/en/news-room/content/20150611IPR65565/html/Committee-on-Legal-Affairs-meeting-16062015

]]> By: Federico https://communia-association.org/2015/06/15/reda-report-the-good-the-not-so-bad-and-the-ugly-compromise-amendments/#comment-61710 Mon, 15 Jun 2015 20:53:59 +0000 http://communia-association.org/?p=1379#comment-61710 166 is also not bad and will be voted separately.

So there will be up to 15 votes on freedom of panorama (paragraph 16). If I count correctly (by grepping pdftohtml -c -s voting_list.pdf), there are up 260 amendments to vote, with over 300 having been absorbed by compromise amendments. Probably less than 10 seconds per amendment, the chair will have a hard job.

]]>